Thank you very much for the question.
There are a number of companies that are excluded from many of the terms of the agreement because they were excluded from the trade remedy cases themselves under softwood. These are predominantly mills that either use logs imported from the United States and therefore do not come under the ambit of the dispute, or use logs from private lands. There are a number of mills that were excluded from the scope of the softwood lumber cases because of their usage of logs either from private land or from America, particularly from Maine. So you'll find they're predominantly border mills.
The agreement just reflects the decisions that were taken during the case itself to exclude these companies because they're outside of the scope.