Perhaps I'll just start on some general points, and then I'll turn to my colleagues from CRA, where this is.
First of all, I apologize if I said “government money”. I don't disagree with that; it's taxpayers' money.
With respect to the discussion and the reference to our last meeting, it's true that, with respect to the special charge, in the legislation there is not specific reference to the remission that will be provided to those companies that are participating in the EDC program. Of course, any legislation has accompanying regulatory elements. The remission element of that procedure will come under the Financial Administration Act. So that's with respect to your second point in your introductory remarks.
Third, I think what we've identified, and I'll stand to be corrected by the experts in CRA, are what I understand to be basically activities that result if payments are not made under the law. And therefore these types of elements, I would have thought, are pretty well standard types of recourse by the government.
At this point, I think, with respect to specific clause references and the path you drew, I will refer to my colleagues in CRA.