When you use the term “comprehensively”, I suspect it's because it's a long list.
But with respect, Mr. Benoit, from the point of view of a customs attorney, it's not comprehensive; it's vague. And from the point of view of the industry, it will be vague. I mentioned this at the beginning, just because there are references to tariff items.... Tariff items are subject to broad interpretation, and then the rest of the language uses terms such as “including”, and so forth, which leave things rather open-ended.
By the way, if we do know what these terms are—and the industry is well aware of what these products are—why not deal with them? I guess that's what we're saying.