It wouldn't be both ways, until your question now. Over the course of the litigation, I was asked that question by many companies, and I first had to stipulate, of course, that I'm not a Canadian tax lawyer. But I offer that information to advise you that I'm aware that some companies did and some companies didn't. Not everyone claimed a tax deduction from those deposits, in part because of the expectation that they would get the deposits back through the course of the litigation.
So you're right, there would be a question raised for those companies that had a tax benefit already, to have an additional tax benefit, as to at least the deduction and possibly the interest earned, but the correction I offer is that it's not true of everybody. Therefore, it would be appropriate to make the adjustment in recognition also, as in my answer to Mr. Temelkovski, of the peculiar circumstance that this money was held hostage while it was losing value.