I indicated very clearly I wanted to speak on amendment NDP-2, and I would like the opportunity to speak now. Mr. Cardin spoke very eloquently on NDP-2 and NDP-1, obviously raising the point that essentially you've combined these two amendments. I'm not objecting necessarily to the combination. I am objecting to it taking place after the fact. But you've already allowed debate, so in a sense we're already engaged in the debate. You can't refuse me from debating an issue, which is amendment NDP-2, even if we have had debate on NDP-1.
On November 2nd, 2006. See this statement in context.