Thank you very much.
I'm taking a look at both Mr. Casey's and Mr. LeBlanc's amendments, on pages 22 and 23. I do see that they are almost exactly the same, and I'd like to applaud both members for the great work they have done here.
But I do have a little concern here. I notice that there might be just a slip of the words. A couple of words seem to be wrong here. I'm looking at the top of Mr. Casey's, which says:
If, during a particular calendar quarter, exports of softwood lumber products from Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island or Newfoundland and Labrador
The word “or” is correct, but when I come down to the very bottom of it, at the third line from the bottom, it says “and”. I think someone should be proposing a subamendment to change that to “or”.
I see Mr. LeBlanc seems to be in favour of that. I'm looking at his as well, and he has “and” in his two positions. They should read “or” as well.
So I just wanted to express my concerns, but I also wanted to comment that the amendment we put forward on the government side with respect to clause 14 will be withdrawn if this were to pass.