Mr. Chair, I've taken a look at this, and it seems to me that we have agreement from around the table, just from conversations I've had, that we support a definition. I have just a little concern with the definition provided by Mr. LeBlanc's amendment. I'm a little concerned that it might be a little too restrictive and might limit the number of remanufacturers who want to participate.
I'm suggesting that perhaps someone should be making a subamendment. Perhaps it could just take the exact wording that sets out the definition of remanufacturers in the softwood lumber agreement and place it into the legislation. I think it would perhaps make the remanufacturers happy and would accommodate and accomplish exactly what Mr. LeBlanc was attempting to do.
I would very much appreciate it if someone would put forward a subamendment--oh, looky here.