I understand that, but we were asking specifically, right now, about the subamendment that suggests such information should be forwarded to the Minister of National Revenue. I understand that you're speaking directly to Mr. LeBlanc's amendment, and I appreciate what you're saying, but now we have a subamendment. Would the subamendment not somehow be a friendly amendment to bring it back around to what the original clause was intended to do?
On November 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.