Basically, how it works is that the scope is frozen under the agreement as of April 27, 2006. When I say “scope”, I'm referring to the scope of product coverage under the agreement. That scope of product coverage is based on the revocation of the anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders that existed up until recently, so as of April 27, 2006, it was based on the anti-dumping countervailing duty orders.
On March 3, 2006, the U.S. Department of Commerce ruled that end-matched products were included in that scope. Because they're included in that scope, as of April 27 they are included in the scope of product coverage under the agreement. Therefore, they're included in the scope of the agreement and this amendment isn't correct; they're included in the scope of the coverage under the softwood lumber agreement. They're not excluded from the scope of the coverage.
If a NAFTA panel were to rule in the future that possibly they should have been excluded from this coverage, at that point we could go to the U.S. and ask for a technical working group to resolve that issue, but as it currently stands, they're included--end-matched products are included in the scope of the coverage.