Yes, I will, Mr. Chair. Thank you very much.
I will move NDP-26, again trying to address the most egregious aspects of this bill.
It important that parliamentarians are here to do a job, not to simply rubber stamp bad legislation. Here we have bad legislation and unprecedented rules of order to muzzle and to censor members who speak up about the various aspects of this bill that are punitive in nature and that are going to have very negative implications for the softwood community right across the country, the softwood communities and particularly softwood lumber companies.
Now, here, in Bill C-24, clause 34, we'd be amending line 34, which is on page 20: “period is not more than $25, the Minister may cancel the interest and penalty.” The amendment would be: “period is not more than $250, the Minister shall cancel the interest and penalty.” So for a period of not more than $250, the minister shall cancel the interest and the penalty. In other words, the minister is directed—doesn't have the option but is directed—to cancel that penalty in order to benefit the softwood communities and the softwood companies that are having to suffer under this egregiously bad bill. So it would be amending from $25 to not more than $250—