Mr. Chair, I think it's important that they actually read these amendments, which they're taking 60 seconds to consider and vote on—this type of back-of-a-napkin legislation that is going to make a huge difference for softwood companies. We've already seen what this committee has done to lumber remanufacturers.
What we have in clause 40, Mr. Chair, are very tight timelines and what we wanted on the company side. But in terms of how the minister acts, we don't have tight components at all. What we have is fairly loose language, as far as the minister is concerned.
We already know when we talk about reverse onus, what we have is as Vern Krishna said in The Lawyers Weekly a couple of weeks ago. The taxpayer must either prepay his taxes—