I'll give you a bit of a rundown on what has happened in Australia.
The Australian Wheat Board has undergone a process of corporatization. Among other changes, it has lost its domestic marketing monopoly. It still retains the single-desk external selling monopoly, so to that extent the Canadian Wheat Board and the Australian Wheat Board remain similar.
The Australian Wheat Board also lost its direct support from the government. The underpinning of credits has been removed and there is now a commercially applied business risk process. So we have gone through a process of realigning the Australian Wheat Board to the point where it is most effective in managing the vagaries of the international market, but still retains the benefits of pooling, while removing all the elements we stand against and have not been supportive of. We've been principled in the approach of dealing with the Australian Wheat Board. We have worked with farmers in making those changes. The farmer population has been very much involved. Some sort of farmer plebiscite was involved at some point.
That said, as it stands, political issues aside, the Australian Wheat Board has been, and continues to be, very successful as an operating entity for exports. However, some issues were seen domestically and are gradually being addressed. In terms of exports, in 2010, the single-desk monopoly for the Australian Wheat Board will be reviewed. That's been in the cards, and there has been a transparent process, a road map if you like, laid out for the reform of Australian grain marketing.
The fundamental difference I would note about the Australian Wheat Board and the Canadian Wheat Board is that the Australian Wheat Board applied to the entire country, and the Canadian Wheat Board is only applied to certain parts. As the change takes place, we'll see, but I think our exports have stood up, I think our prices have stood up, and I don't think there are any negative aspects to the commercialization process.