Maybe I should, but anyway, in spite of that, what I want to say is that I'm going to go back to what you said. I could see where your thinking is, so if I sat across from you all day, I'd have a hard time changing your thinking. But if worldwide capacity is twice worldwide demand, and if it's easy to move from one country to another, then if you put a fence up, you're going to get it in the other door, especially if the other door allows you to bring it in tariff-free from Bangladesh.
That's a practical issue, because I'm living it every day. It could be done. The reason other countries had an industry, sir, was because the Chinese quota was utilized before. So all these other countries developed. It all went back to China because it's easier to deal there. It has a better infrastructure; I'll agree with that. But when it comes to cost and you're fighting on price only, then you have to go to the lowest-cost producer, so you're going to run to Bangladesh. China is not going to be an answer for this country. That's the reality.
The question of American Apparel is a great example. In other words, I agree, move up the value chain. These are the companies that are going to survive: the ones that have a price-value relationship. We will never be the lowest-cost producer. We just won't. It hasn't worked in the United States, so it's not going to work here.
That's the practical answer. Theory I'll discuss with you all day, and I have no animosity.