I have not said that we needed further research. I said we needed the researchers to do the report the way that is standard procedure at all committees, not pass motions that are one-sided, giving only one part of the whole program and only one part of the witness testimony. I'm sure you must agree that we do the entire industry a great injustice by ignoring the other witnesses who've taken the time to be here to give us their evidence.
I'm not asking the researchers to do research. I'm asking them to put together a report based on the research we have been receiving here at the table. I don't think that's unreasonable. That is normal procedure. We're completely disrespecting not only their work but the other witnesses who've come before us, as though what they've had to say is of no importance or of any value whatsoever. And that's just not realistic.