I think the greatest contentious issue in terms of that is to use regulatory measures as a way of protecting an industry. You can use environmental standards, for example, that are different from, let's say, the Americans', which would prevent the American companies from investing unless they adopt the same standards, and they're saying that's not fair, in terms of that.
When you say protecting the public and the environment is paramount, having a very effective and efficient system to do that, a regulatory system, what we're seeing now is not a very efficient system. There are some doubts about whether it's actually effective, as well.
There's a lot of duplication and overlap that exists between the provinces, between the provinces and the feds, between various federal departments, between various provincial ministries. There's a lot of red tape. Basically, that is creating a problem with respect to our competitiveness and it is not necessarily benefiting the Canadian public or the environment. So there's a lot of improvement we can do with our regulatory system, to start.
Basically, the message is that we shouldn't say we're going to streamline the regulations at the expense of public safety and environmental protection, but there's certainly a way of doing it in a much better way than we're currently seeing. And that's basically the issue.