Well, I think Quebec, even though I don't know it in detail, has tremendous potential. I know there are proud and hard-working people there.
If you look at the Icelandic example, even though I'm from the constituency of Reykjavik, I was brought up in a rural area and I know that quite well. Maybe that's a good example of how things change. If you look at Icelandic agriculture—and I can promise you it's much less competitive than Quebec or Canadian agriculture—what has happened is that there has gotten to be less and less over the past decade or two.
For example, the little town I was brought up in was basically, first and foremost, about agriculture and service towards agriculture. It's very little about agriculture at the moment, but it has still been prosperous because it has taken something over—for example, tourism, and a lot of other things.
Strange as it seems, when you look at what you could call a crisis, very often there are new opportunities that come, and that is what has happened in Iceland.
You mentioned a few sectors. They are not big at all in Iceland. They used to be, maybe a decade or two ago, but they have been changed, transformed into high-tech, into more educated labour, tourism, and more emphasis on education and other opportunities. I think we have been very fortunate going on this path.
You mentioned that of course Quebec could probably be an independent country, but even though we are independent and wouldn't like to have it otherwise, we wouldn't do anything if it wouldn't be a part of a bigger market. Because we are a part of the internal market of the EEA, the EU, and EFTA, that's the reason we have been so prosperous. If we had been protective and put tariffs on those things as we used to do, we wouldn't have the achievement we've had in our economy in the last ten or twenty years.