Well, these are slightly different sets of issues.
On the negotiations, there are some very specific things that are holding up the talks. I think they can be resolved. It will obviously involve give and take. All agreements are second best. Okay? There are no first-best agreements in any free trade agreement or in any multilateral talks. The parties simply have to come to terms with the domestic political constituencies in order to make those breakthroughs.
In the case of Canada, one of those constituencies is shipbuilding, and we have to find a way to address that domestic problem. The Singaporeans can't solve that for us. By the same token, the Singaporeans have to find ways of overcoming whatever hang-up they have in terms of our ask to them on the services or investment sectors.
I really want to stress that I think we can close the Singapore deal. But even if we cannot close it, there are so many other things we can do and should do so we're not seen as being focused only on one deal and have nothing else to do. Air services we can work on. Visas we can work on, perhaps by having more immigration staff, a more streamlined procedure, or a different way of processing visas. The British, for example, have outsourced some of the initial screening procedures for visa applications in China. Maybe we can do that. I don't know. We can work, obviously, on the FIPA agreements in Indonesia and Vietnam. There may be other markets where we can also pursue investment agreements. We cannot let a stalled agreement be the domino, as you say, because we can actually move forward on other dominoes in the meantime.