Starting with health, I'm not a WTO expert. Mr. Clark may be able to address the broader implications for global trade rules. But what I've discussed concerning the opportunities for the export of health services has no impact, I believe, on the public health care system in Canada. We are not talking about bringing sick people from Asia to provide them with services in this country. Rather, we're talking about taking medical expertise, dental expertise, physiotherapy maybe, sports medicine, that kind of expertise in Canada, and providing it in countries that already have the provision for private delivery of health care. That's their system; it's not our system. And throughout Southeast Asia there is an appetite for private delivery of health and health-related services. We have expertise in this country in those areas. It makes sense to encourage our companies who have that expertise to try to develop it overseas.
In the area of education, there already is a thriving market in the provision of education services to foreign nationals. As you know, they pay quite a large premium over domestic students, over Canadian students. In many cases, the foreign student fees make it possible for universities and colleges to reinvest, to expand their facilities, to make sure they get the best teachers. There has to be a balance between the number of foreign students that we take in and the number of places we reserve for Canadians. But on balance, having foreign students not only enriches the budget and the bottom line of the universities; it enriches the education experience of Canadian students. I would be very sorry to see a more restrictive approach to foreign students on any grounds.