When you don't have a financial quagmire over your head, it allows you to think more long term. I think right now, as everyone around this table has recognized, getting the deposits back is obviously a huge plus. It's a huge lure. It's short-term gain, and everyone needs that right now.
But then, as Mr. Wakelin said, you have that short-term gain, but where are you going to be seven years from now? So you get this deposit in year one--we won't get it back in a year, but maybe 18 months from now--and what happens after that? What happens for the next five and a half years?
Just think about the huge difference the assistance would make to those companies that would choose to use loan guarantees. And as was mentioned earlier, not everyone would use them, but it might keep 200 people employed in a community where the sawmill is the only employer. That's a huge, significant benefit. So loan guarantees are huge, and they should stay on the table.
Your original question was why we wouldn't sign this deal.