Merci.
As I mentioned earlier in my testimony, we're concerned about the rush, because as Mr. Grenier has just said, a deficient agreement will work to the benefit of the U.S. industry and absolutely will be to the detriment of the Canadian industry. At the end of the day, I think all of us in this room--I mean, we're all Canadians, we're all working for the same objective, to keep our people employed, to keep communities healthy across Canada--want the same thing. So we have to recognize that we have one chance to get this right. If we rush that language through, and it's not a reliable commercial agreement, then it is Canadians who will pay the consequence.
We have fine negotiators. We have great trade lawyers. But they don't operate the mills. We have respected businessmen, such as Trevor Wakelin and Murray, who run the mills. They are asking to be at the table. They are asking to be a part of helping governments develop the complexity that's required in the language, so we can make sure it's right and make sure that we can continue to operate for seven years. That's why we're concerned--and it is a real concern.
On deposits, just to add to that--