Thank you.
I only want to say that we've been working really closely with our provincial government, as I know the industry has been doing in Quebec. Having said that, if the framework says that you have a hard cap quota in option B of 34% and it declines to date, for example, at 330, instead of a 34% market share, we'd be at 32%.
These are the issues we talk about when we say that we don't have the details. We need the details so that we can make good, sound business decisions to ensure that we have a good, solid commercial agreement going forward that we all agree to sign.
It's difficult right now for both industry and our provincial government to know with any degree of certainty, because we have a lot of assumptions when analyzing the technical aspects that were given to us from the framework. There are a lot of assumptions that are made. Does it mean this or that, as Mr. Wakelin referred to earlier? Is it retrospective? Is it prospective? Is it carry-forward? All the technical aspects of actually running the business are left with question marks. You're making assumptions, and you're then asked to decide, as a province, whether you're going to go with option A or option B based on assumptions.
To make it short, we need more detail to clearly ensure that all of the companies operating right now know what it is they're committing to.