As you know, the coalition has been constantly active in launching formal complaints over many years, so this is nothing new. The issue will be resolved at the government-to-government level, and when we hear—if we hear—from the U.S. government that they wish to start some formal dispute resolution proceeding, we'll deal with it. But right now we're exchanging information, and the discussions are constructive.
The agreement was designed to evolve; the agreement was not designed to stay static. It was designed so that we could explore exit ramps. It was designed so that we could explore how to deal with the log export issue, which I know is another bee in your bonnet and one we can talk about later, if you wish.
It's an evolutionary agreement, and it provides mechanisms for us to talk together, as opposed to getting into these dispute resolution panels and expensive litigation processes that characterize the use of chapter 19.