Thank you, sir.
That is one of the issues. The other issue is, as you correctly pointed out, that environmental assessments have not yet been done.
Interestingly enough, locations have not yet been chosen, and these are, frankly, very fundamental yet enormously basic decisions that come before a discussion of the preclearance issue, which raises complex constitutional and legal arguments. What we're simply saying is, can we not agree as a committee to recommend to the House that it move with all due haste in terms of site selection, in terms of environmental assessment, and in terms of frequency of meetings to ensure constitutional jurisdictional issues are rectified sooner rather than later?