There clearly are, in our view, products for which a North American standard makes sense. For example, we talked about the proverbial movement of cars back and forth, and as they move back and forth, more and more products are added to them. That's just a reality. But all the different components have a U.S. standard and a Canadian standard. So there's compliance with two sets of standards. Notwithstanding the fact that North American labourers, if I can put it in those terms, work together to produce a North American vehicle, there's a plague in that there's both the Canadian standard for the variety of products that exist and there's the U.S. standard.
I didn't hear the chamber, in its opening statements, and I have not heard the chamber say anywhere else that the chamber is asking for a race to the bottom on the issue of developing common standards. What the chamber is asking for is the development of common standards that are mutually beneficial to both Canada and the United States pursuant to negotiations and agreements between the two of them.