Merci beaucoup.
I'd like to come back to the issue of a regulatory framework, which means basically protections for Canadian families. There is a strong push, and we've heard in testimony from government spokespeople, who always say that all the information is out there, which is false, as we know...and they also say there is no problem with harmonization. But we know that in the United States the regulatory process is flawed. We saw that with bovine growth hormone. We've seen that with a number of scandals in the pharmaceutical industry and on issues around food safety.
What would Canadian families be giving up in terms of those fundamental protections, knowing that protections for your food, your pharmaceutical products, those kinds of things, are in place? What do we give up if we, as with the softwood lumber agreement, simply concede everything to basically making sure those decisions are made in Washington rather than being made here in Canada by Canadians?