Take, for example, the recent issue that has come up with respect to pesticide standards. It's been reported that obviously we've got better standards, simply because we use less pesticide. Now we've harmonized with the United States, which in effect increases the level of pesticide use. That has ramifications for our environment and our health.
This speaks to the point in the presentation that was made on page 2, where it says the aim of the SPP is:
—to provide greater economic opportunity, while maintaining high standards of health and safety. To this end, the United States, Mexico, and Canada will work together with stakeholders—
—and that's what I'm talking about, stakeholders—
—to strengthen competitiveness, reduce cost of trade, and enhance quality of life.
How does this particular change in regulation enhance the quality of life? In your opinion, does it enhance it or does it compromise it? Yes, there might be benefits in terms of trade, because now the regulation matches up, but what kind of impact does this have in terms of the standards we set versus the standards the United States has? I would like your opinion on that.