In terms of better transparency and accountability—and I want your feedback on this—in your opinion, should any changes to regulations that are decided by the departments, pesticides, for example, be brought forward to the committee on a quarterly or semi-annual basis for review and public discussion for better public oversight? Is that a way to improve the process?
The concern is that we always find out about this after the fact. My suggestion is that before any regulation is changed, those proposed changes be brought to committee for discussion and debate. Therefore, there's no element of surprise, and at the same time it allows the stakeholders to present their case in public.
Is that, in your opinion, a way to improve the process? We have to find a solution, and I think that might be a viable one.