I just want clarification on this. The amendment that was brought forth says that “the number of witnesses be balanced for and against”. How does one determine “for and against”? How is this criterion established? Ultimately, that's my concern: in whose viewpoint? It's very subjective. From what perspective are we talking? Is it on the subject matter? Then who determines “for” and “against”? I have some concerns about that amendment.
On May 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.