Mr. Chair, it is exactly what Mr. Temelkovski requested and what the clerk has read. The difference between its being appended to the minutes, marked “unofficial”, and being circulated with the minutes unofficially is that the circulation of the minutes unofficially is something that takes place on a regular basis. I don't want minutes, and I don't think Mr. Temelkovski wants minutes circulated that do not contain that valuable testimony from the second part of the meeting. Unofficial as it may have been—and that's for the Speaker to clarify—we're not contesting the fact that it would be marked “unofficial”. But I think what we are pressing for on this side of the table is that it be circulated with the minutes. “Appended” could mean circulated or not, depending on the choice of the chair. We're not suggesting that. We're suggesting it be part of the minutes and circulated, though marked “unofficial”.
On May 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.