Speaking again with respect to the machinery of government, developing policy, implementing policy, and again using the softwood lumber agreement as an example, there is an anti-circumvention clause that exists and that dictates to a certain degree the terms of our policies. That concern has been raised.
How do you think the machinery of government can deal with that? Doesn't it tie Canada's hands, in effect, in what kinds of policies it develops and how it implements them, basically? Some people have described it as compromising our sovereignty in terms of developing policy here.