Mr. Chair, these are motions that are adopted by committee. It would be absurd to start to have a motion that is then followed by a dissenting motion, and then followed by another dissenting motion. It just becomes absolutely bizarre. What we have is the opportunity to provide a dissident report when the committee provides a full report, as we did with the international trade committee report that we completed a few weeks ago. There, it's a very complex matter.
It's obvious that each party might agree or disagree with certain of the recommendations, and it's important to be on the record, and we've clearly indicated that the parties have the right to be on the record for these reports. But for a motion, we're already on record. We voted on the motion. We had a recorded vote, so every single member of the Canadian public would know which member supported that motion and which member did not support the motion. But it's absolutely absurd to get into the point where we have a two-paragraph motion, followed by another two-paragraph motion from the Conservatives because they disagree with the motion that was adopted. It's just an absurd practice.
So there was in Mr. Menzies' motion absolutely no indication that it would apply to all motions. We adopted a motion. It's on the record, whether Conservatives supported it or not, and you should have tabled the report this week.