It's a question of where the incentive is. There are a number of groups that have linked issues; for example, the United States and the European Union have made it quite clear they're linking what they're prepared to do on agricultural support to movement on market access and NAMA.
The reluctance to move in NAMA is largely coming from the developing countries at the present time, but overall, there's a very big concern in NAMA that when people got into this, they didn't fully appreciate the competitive pressures that would be coming from China and, to a lesser extent, from some of the new tigers in Asia and South America. But China seems to be on a lot of minds.
If you talk to the negotiators, they say it's one thing to reduce a tariff if you're dealing with Canada or Japan or even with Korea, but reducing the tariffs to deal with China, where they're paid $60 to $80 a month for 60-hour weeks, is a lot more difficult to cope with. That's why you have all of the pressure right now in the WTO, consultations on auto parts and on access to the market, and the concerns being expressed by automotive and auto parts industries around the world about improved access.