On the point that Mr. Masse made, and Mr. Bains, about the status quo and don't change anything, this is not a precedent. The committees that I have sat on go by this model. I couldn't believe it when I heard yesterday that this committee didn't operate under the same way. Like, how long has that gone on? It's not right.
If you do your homework, there are very few committees that operate like this. Any of the ones that I actually checked into operate by the model that I have proposed. It's fair. I mean, it's the same speaking arrangement as the way that the committees have been divided up.
So it is not a precedent, if that's what you think.
Thank you.