Mr. Chair, I think there is an obvious consensus that members of the opposition will support some type of rendition of this motion. Also, the government are opposed to it. But the reality is that this is a recommendation to the government; it is not binding the government. The opposition is trying to send a message to the government that they are very concerned about the issues in this motion. I would suggest that, because there is no binding effect, the government.... We are recommending that they consider.
Why don't we just get on with it and get over the semantics? We're going to sit here all night and at the next meeting debating little words here and there, but eventually there will be a motion that will come forward and that will be acceptable to the opposition but has no binding effect. Why don't we just get over it?