Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I just want to respond very briefly to what Mr. Miller said. I do disagree with Mr. Miller's remarks with respect to the softwood lumber agreement. I think that does compound the issue. You're absolutely right when it comes to the high Canadian dollar; you're absolutely when it comes to the U.S. housing market playing a role in the crisis faced by our forestry sector. But the fact that the government can virtually do nothing with the industry presently because of the way the softwood lumber agreement is structured is problematic. I think the fact of the $1 billion fund just being announced, and the fact the government has given more assurances to the U.S. on the forestry sector, saying that it won't violate that agreement, speaks to the concern about specifically helping the forestry sector.
I think this motion speaks to a concern in that industry, and it's about investment and infrastructure and R and D. It's not a handout. It's about how we transition and become more competitive.