Like my colleague, I would like to clarify. First, the name of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal should perhaps be changed, because in my opinion politicians can't interfere in a decision by any other judicial or civil tribunal, and ordinarily the decisions can be enforced. I would therefore ask for my colleague to clarify.
How does he understand this? What happens when the tribunal makes a decision about something, in accordance with measures that the government itself has adopted, for determining whether there is dumping going on, for example? It is the government that has established the measures for identifying it, and the tribunal makes a decision or recommendation using the tools available to it. What does he think about implementing the decisions or recommendations? How much latitude can the government have in respect of the decisions of a tribunal that has relied on things that the government has adopted?
I would like Mr. Bains to clarify this for me a bit.