You've highlighted that with respect to the deal that the U.S. has tentatively signed—I know it hasn't been ratified—it is much more advantageous for them and it puts us at a disadvantage. But I was wondering what the rationale is, aside from, as you've indicated, that part of it is the countries that have negotiated just might want to move on. Is there any other rationale or feedback that you received from the negotiators as to why we were unable to be put in a better position?
On February 4th, 2008. See this statement in context.