I have very little to add to what Shirley-Ann has said, but I would say that from the standpoint of balance of trade, I believe we are attempting in any negotiation of this not to immediately redress the balance of trade, but to redress the rules by which an uneven balance of trade has come to pass. So we are trying to reset the conditions in such a way that as long as our companies and our farmers and others can compete and produce products, goods, and services that Korean consumers want, then with a good agreement we will have an opportunity to redress any balance-of-trade issue. We certainly feel that way in our case.
Finally, with respect to non-tariff barriers to trade, I think in the auto sector, in our sector, and so forth, having transparency as to what they are and having a means to address non-tariff barriers to trade--such as the standard that faces RIM right now--are essential components of a good agreement.