Thank you. No, it wasn't that we need to do more studies. The time for that has passed.
What I was referring to when I said we need to know more is that we need to know exactly what would be in the agreement, because there are still some unfinished provisions, and they're in very critical areas. So before we can make a judgment, we need to know what all the details of the agreements are. My understanding is that there are also provisions for what are called “most favoured nation” clauses, or MFN clauses. So if Europe ratifies an agreement that has more in it than what Canada has, through these MFN provisions we might be able to get the same terms. This is important to us, because Europe and the U.S. are larger markets and may be able to gain greater access. So it would be very helpful if we understood exactly what was in the European and U.S. agreements before we made a determination as to whether we should ratify a Canadian agreement. That was my point.