Yes. On the question of what Canada could do if, hypothetically, subsidies were reintroduced by Norway, I've already pointed out that Canada does reserve or maintain it's rights under the WTO. So that's clear.
In addition, we have built into the agreement the concept of non-violation, nullification, and impairment, which is a concept peculiar to trade law. This will allow Canada to bring an action against, hypothetically, Norway if this were to occur, because there was a clear understanding between the parties at the time the agreement was negotiated that Canada was going to reduce tariffs on ships and related items in return for Norway, in particular, not subsidizing. We built that specifically into article 29, paragraph 4, where reference is made to a benefit that reasonably could have been expected to accrue to Canada or any other party that is being nullified or impaired as a result of the application of any measure that is not inconsistent with the agreement.
So here we are beyond the written text. Canada could then take an action against Norway, and if successful, we could then expect that the Norwegian measure would be removed pursuant to article 30, paragraph 2, or that Canada would receive some other form of compensation.
This is to clarify that we are not without remedies under the agreement, if we were to get into this hypothetical situation.