Yes, it doesn't start in its equal reductions for three years. In addition to that, if the subsidies are having an effect and they're causing material injury to the domestic producers, there is a potential to bring a countervailing duty case against Norway. That's not precluded by the agreement. If the CBSA, Canada Border Services Agency, finds that there has been subsidization, and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal finds that there has been injury, then duties can be put in place to counteract the effect of the subsidization for a period of five years, and then it can be renewed for another five-year period. That's not prevented by the free trade agreement.
If we also find that there is illegal subsidization, we can always go to the WTO under the SCM agreement. That being said, we've been through Brazil aircraft, and when you suggest that one country has illegal subsidies, you might bring a claim against yourself as well. But that's always an open avenue in order to get the subsidies to stop if they are still going. Hopefully over this time period the effects of the subsidies back in time will have diminished.