In answer to your question, I don't know of any shipbuilding studies so I can't really be helpful about the contents. I've not come across anything in my research that's publicly available on the industry. I am following the Korea free trade agreement closely. Wherever you have an overlap in industry between the two negotiating countries, you're going to have some friction, with one industry saying it's going to have some difficulties. This is a common occurrence. This is why many free trade agreements are negotiated between countries that have no overlap.
With the Korea agreement, there's a significant overlap and a much louder industry talking about the effects. I think it also is a factor right now that the U.S. has negotiated with Korea. So it really was North American industry coming forward and looking at these issues where you don't have the same thing, because the U.S. has not been negotiating with EFTA and Canada simultaneously.
That being said, even though I don't know of a market study, when I, as an academic, look at the agreement and the fact that it's a 10- or 15-year phase-out period, the fact that the anti-dumping mechanism is mentioned in the agreement and the fact that there is the transitional safeguard mechanism so that a country's specific safeguard can be brought under the CEFTA, someone must have been considering this particular industry in the negotiation.
Again, when I compare it to other free trade agreements, this agreement goes further than I've seen any other agreement go but for the U.S.-Australia agreement on beef. So I think someone does have a study somewhere. Whether it's within the Department of Foreign Affairs or whether it is in Industry, I don't know because I haven't seen it. But when I look at the provisions, I think they were carefully negotiated and longer concessions were drawn out of our EFTA partners in the agreement. As an academic looking at it, that's what I would conclude, not knowing the true background.