Let me take them in the order you outlined them.
The notion that we would set up a solidarity fund, or whatever it be called, to be there to remedy abuses after they've happened, to provide some sort of redress to victims after their rights have been violated, is simply not the approach. Surely we want an approach that is going to prevent and avoid human rights violations from happening in the first place, not to mitigate them in some way after the fact.
We come back to that central recommendation about the absolutely vital need for a strong, independent human rights impact assessment to be done. How it's even possible to set up the solidarity fund--to address what?--without having carried out the human rights impact assessment that really clearly identifies what the potential consequences and impact of this agreement for human rights are seems wrong-headed in itself. So it again comes back to the importance of that happening.
The issue of paramilitary reconstitution--recycling, as it's often called--is a very real concern in Colombia. It's true that significant numbers, through various processes of paramilitary, have supposedly been demobilized. It's now very well documented by sources like the Organization of American States, which has a mission on the ground monitoring the demobilization process, that there's a whole recycling process happening whereby new paramilitary groups, some of whom are the ones I referred to in some of those case examples--the death threats, etc.--are coming from those groups. There's a recycling happening. Get out of one group, be demobilized, and then these other groups are forming. Because of the deep impunity that continues to be so entrenched in Colombia, it's no surprise that people make those choices to reassemble into illegal groups that commit grave human rights abuses, because there haven't been consequences in the past.
With respect to concerns about activists, labour union activists, human rights defenders, and others who have received death threats and, worse, have been attacked and killed after, in some way individually or as a group, or even just as a broad sector, being criticized or denounced by not just President Uribe but other senior members of the government, absolutely, that's a very clear pattern. At my fingertips I don't have the precise....