In that context, then all it does is provide corporations with more protections. It does nothing for human rights. So it will not do anything that....
There are a number of ways Canada could address this. They could start by implementing the consensus agreement, the consensus recommendations from the national round tables that just happened, as a beginning. They could actually extra-territorially regulate corporations acting abroad when they're operating in conflict zones. I don't think a company could argue against the types of provisions that I suggested because no corporation is out loud going to say, “We should be allowed to be complicit in violations of human rights that constitute international crimes.” I don't think a corporation would argue that, for profit, we should be allowed to do that. Most corporations say they are doing all of this already. The corporations that have these corporate social responsibility programs say, “We are screening their security forces. We support human rights.”
I don't see there is a business argument against actually bringing in binding legal obligations.