They're my five minutes, Sukh, and I can spend them any way I want.
I'm going to share my time with Mr. Keddy. I have just a couple of points.
Mr. Cruess, I want to thank you guys for what you do in terms of leading and in terms of corporate responsibility. I think you're doing a great job. We had a chance to speak to some of your people in Colombia and were very impressed by your example.
The concern we have is we talked to the trade unions in Colombia who said they have this list of Canadian violations, but yet can't provide anybody. I sense that there's not a whole lot of credibility that I can see when someone can make those kinds of outrageous statements and not be able to back them.
The question I have for you, Mr. Cruess or Mr. Torres, is how is it that a government that's been panned by some of our witnesses--as well as what we've seen down in Colombia by some of the trade groups--can actually win a second election with 62% of the popular vote, and, quite frankly, is shown to have almost 80% support? It seems outrageous to me that we could have all these statements about the government. We know it has issues; we're not denying the fact that there are issues in Colombia. But how is it that a government--supposedly as corrupt as it is--can get re-elected with 62% of the vote and have an 80% popular vote?
That's my only question for Mr. Torres and Mr. Cruess. Go ahead.