Okay.
I have a question for both sides, the “anti” and the “pro”, in terms of the free trade agreement.
To the anti-agreement or conditional advocates, are the human rights abuses, per se, the reason why you would say not to go ahead, or is it the possibility or the claim that the government is either complicit in or covering up the human rights abuses?
In other words, if the government's involvement were not an issue, and if those human rights abuses were outside the government's control, and they were trying, would it still be a no? Is it the abuses, or is it the government's role in them that is the concern?
I would like an answer from both of you.