Thank you, Chair.
Our party's view is very consistent with what you've said, in that we feel that we've put a lot of effort into this study on Colombia. We've travelled to Colombia and we've met with a long list of witnesses, and we think it's important that we complete this study first and, subsequently, look at the EFTA implementation act that has been brought before the committee. The only caveat there is that we have additional witnesses we'd like to bring forward, so that needs to managed in the time as well.
So the sequence of events should be consistent with what you said: Colombia first, and then complete the report on it, and then EFTA.
That seems to be our position. I hope that's correct.
Colleagues, does that make sense?