Well, I'm just trying to get through the practicalities here. In terms of the study on EFTA, we're not talking about amending the trade agreement; the trade agreement is done. We're either talking about implementing it or not implementing it. The committee has dealt with EFTA; we've gone through it. We've made a recommendation to the House, and now it's really a matter of its implementation and of going through the implementation bill. Other than people being obstructionist, I don't know why it would take a long time to deal with it. I think as a courtesy we can hear again from industries that may feel more affected than others, but I don't think that would lead to our amending the actual trade agreement.
So I guess I'm just at a bit of a loss here. I think we could go back and forth. We know what the government wants to do. I think we've had a reasonable concession from the Liberal Party that we ought to continue with the study on Colombia and get it done, and maybe take a couple of days before the end of the session to hear from these witnesses and deal with the EFTA agreement, hear a couple of witnesses, do clause-by-clause, and send it back to the House.
Are you in agreement with that, Mr. Bains?