Upon reflection here, I think I would. There was one trade agreement we did like and that was called the Auto Pact, when we got to manufacture one car for every car that was sold in Canada. But you have to understand that the experience of our membership--if you look back 25 years from today, when we started signing these free trade agreements--is that we haven't gained any ground on our standard of living. The 25 years before that, when we had properly managed trade, the Canadian standard of living went up every year. So when you ask our people on the ground if they see a benefit from these so-called trading agreements--and I don't believe they have much to do with trade, they have more to do with protecting investors and protecting the rights of multinational corporations over citizens' rights--most Canadians would say they haven't benefited from it.
You're watching the same thing in the United States. When Barack Obama and Mrs. Clinton talk about renegotiating those trade agreements, their popularity in the United States goes up because Americans are dubious, not at the notion of trade, because we all support trade, but at the notion of how these trade deals were negotiated and by whom. I say that the people who negotiated these agreements have more interest in protecting large multinational corporations than they do the citizens they're supposed to represent. They're bad negotiators, is what they are, and we should put people in there who know how to negotiate.