I think if you look at the manufacturing sector--and you mentioned the forest products industry as a prime example--the forest products sector would not be one of the sectors that would be affected in a negative way by a Korea free trade agreement. In fact, quite the reverse.... It opens up market opportunities for lumber, pulp, paper, OSB, plywood. You name it, substantial opportunities would open up in that sector.
When you look at the manufacturing sector and the impact on jobs in the manufacturing sector, which has been extremely difficult over the last few years, it has nothing to do with Korea; it has nothing to do with the United States. It's been a situation that I think reflects the hypercompetitiveness, particularly of China, but other economies. Exchange rate issues have been very difficult for the manufacturing sector. So I think you have to look broadly at all the fundamental drivers of the competitiveness of manufacturing to really get at that issue.
Are there adjustment programs? They're not in my portfolio. But clearly Minister Solberg and the government are developing and implementing programs designed to assist workers. If there were specific identifiable issues flowing out of a trade agreement, we would certainly look at whether it might be appropriate to have some specific form of assistance. But it's not something you would offer before you could demonstrate there was a unique case for that particular sector.